H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 4–3 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1995 Philadelphia quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | 7-5 6-2 | Gabriela Sabatini | Match data | Nov 11, 1995* | QF | Philadelphia | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Carpet |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-4 6-1 | Anke Huber | Match data | Oct 14, 1995* | SF | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Anke Huber | 6-7 6-1 6-4 | Gabriela Sabatini | Match data | Nov 12, 1994* | SF | Philadelphia | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Carpet |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 7-6 6-0 | Anke Huber | Match data | Jun 30, 1993* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 7-6 6-1 | Anke Huber | Match data | May 15, 1993* | QF | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Anke Huber | 7-5 6-3 | Gabriela Sabatini | Match data | May 17, 1991* | R16 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 7-6 | Anke Huber | Match data | Jun 29, 1990* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,122 | 398 | 205 | 66.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,399 | 613 | 184 | 76.9% | 1 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 10 | 27 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #10 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #11 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,266 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 65–14 | 82.3% | #4 | 2,282 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,259 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,082 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,233 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1996 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,031 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,270 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,969 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,294 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,110 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,872 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,057 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,895 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,063 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #56 | 1,958 | 1 | 27 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anke Huber | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1989 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1985 | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 16 | 1991 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1986 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 17 | 1992 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 1987 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 22 | 5 | 27 | 81.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% |
| 18 | 1993 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1988 | 33 | 6 | 39 | 84.6% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% |
| 19 | 1994 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 1989 | 25 | 5 | 30 | 83.3% | 21 | 3 | 24 | 87.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% |
| 20 | 1995 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 1990 | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% |
| 21 | 1996 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 1991 | 24 | 5 | 29 | 82.8% | 21 | 2 | 23 | 91.3% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% |
| 22 | 1997 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1992 | 28 | 6 | 34 | 82.4% | 23 | 2 | 25 | 92.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% |
| 23 | 1998 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1993 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1999 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1994 | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 25 | 2000 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1995 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 26 | 2001 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1996 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 177 | 97 | 274 | 64.6% | 96 | 45 | 141 | 68.1% | 31 | 13 | 44 | 70.5% | 94 | 50 | 144 | 65.3% | — | 264 | 81 | 345 | 76.5% | 198 | 51 | 249 | 79.5% | 54 | 16 | 70 | 77.1% | 97 | 36 | 133 | 72.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anke Huber | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1518 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.14 | 1984 | 1586 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +28 | — | 50.0% | -0.07 | 4–0 (100%) | 1–0 | — | +0.70 |
| 15 | 1990 | 1709 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -175 | — | 57.7% | +0.90 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.7 | -0.06 | 1985 | 1947 | 156.6 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +18 | -325 | 69.6% | +1.39 | 9–7 (56%) | 8–1 (89%) | 110.0 | +0.93 |
| 16 | 1991 | 1959 | 161.7 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -215 | -283 | 67.0% | +1.21 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–3 (57%) | 104.1 | -0.97 | 1986 | 2024 | 163.4 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +46 | -252 | 66.7% | +1.36 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 102.6 | -4.53 |
| 17 | 1992 | 1974 | 163.5 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -112 | -289 | 64.1% | +1.16 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.2 | -1.03 | 1987 | 2267 | 174.7 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -98 | -411 | 74.7% | +1.86 | 10–6 (63%) | 7–4 (64%) | 107.3 | -8.41 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2059 | 162.3 | — | — | — | — | -40 | -16 | -298 | 66.1% | +0.98 | 13–4 (76%) | 7–6 (54%) | 107.2 | -1.91 | 1988 | 2283 | 175.5 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -24 | -387 | 77.7% | +2.15 | 12–7 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 101.3 | -6.45 |
| 19 | 1994 | 2030 | 158.8 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +18 | — | 64.5% | +1.13 | 12–6 (67%) | 6–4 (60%) | 102.9 | +0.55 | 1989 | 2260 | 175.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +41 | — | 74.8% | +2.16 | 16–3 (84%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.9 | -4.81 |
| 20 | 1995 | 2083 | 168.0 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -34 | -316 | 66.2% | +1.32 | 13–4 (76%) | 6–5 (55%) | 103.3 | -1.78 | 1990 | 2233 | 175.3 | — | — | — | — | +45 | +4 | -235 | 74.1% | +1.94 | 8–3 (73%) | 9–5 (64%) | 101.9 | -3.17 |
| 21 | 1996 | 2032 | 160.5 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -42 | -104 | 66.2% | +1.29 | 17–6 (74%) | 7–10 (41%) | 99.9 | +2.81 | 1991 | 2270 | 177.6 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +107 | -240 | 81.0% | +2.46 | 9–2 (82%) | 12–3 (80%) | 110.2 | -3.71 |
| 22 | 1997 | 1969 | 163.8 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -72 | -51 | 57.6% | +0.58 | 12–10 (55%) | 5–6 (45%) | 96.0 | -1.85 | 1992 | 2294 | 179.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +165 | -170 | 80.4% | +2.52 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.7 | -3.70 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1900 | 158.7 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 55.0% | +0.39 | 9–7 (56%) | 3–7 (30%) | 93.2 | -0.86 | 1993 | 2110 | 172.2 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +275 | -2 | 71.3% | +1.82 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–8 (43%) | 91.5 | -1.15 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1872 | 155.9 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -59 | -11 | 52.6% | +0.17 | 11–10 (52%) | 5–5 (50%) | 97.6 | -1.51 | 1994 | 2057 | 164.9 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +123 | -4 | 67.2% | +1.39 | 11–5 (69%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.2 | -0.85 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1896 | 145.4 | — | — | — | — | -95 | +65 | +31 | 60.0% | +0.73 | 10–7 (59%) | 7–7 (50%) | 99.9 | +0.44 | 1995 | 2063 | 172.1 | — | — | — | — | +41 | +69 | +16 | 71.5% | +1.92 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–10 (38%) | 88.1 | +0.28 |
| 26 | 2001 | 1834 | 151.0 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +62 | +138 | 62.2% | +0.78 | 8–9 (47%) | 8–4 (67%) | 99.3 | +0.22 | 1996 | 1958 | 159.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 58.8% | +1.02 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.49 |
| Career | — | 2123 | 165.4 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -32 | -124 | 61.8% | +0.88 | 123–79 (61%) | 66–63 (51%) | 100.5 | -1.02 | — | 2400 | 176.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +66 | -221 | 73.0% | +1.86 | 109–59 (65%) | 68–55 (55%) | 104.0 | -4.44 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | 1 | 12 | 13 | Mar 26, 2001 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 3 | 10 | 13 | Nov 15, 1999 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 4 | 8 | 12 | Mar 25, 2001 | H2H |
| Jana Novotna | 4 | 8 | 12 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 5 | 6 | 11 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 11 | 28 | 39 | Sep 9, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 12 | 11 | 23 | Sep 23, 1995 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 13 | 10 | 23 | Sep 7, 1995 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 6 | 15 | 21 | Nov 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 12 | 6 | 18 | Aug 19, 1995 | H2H |