H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anke Huber vs Gala Leon Garcia H2H: 3-1
Anke Huber holds a 3–1 lead over Gala Leon Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2001 Sopot quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2001* | Sopot | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-3 7-5 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2000* | Sopot | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Anke Huber | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1999* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-3 6-1 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anke Huber | 6-1 6-1 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Gala Leon Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |