H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anke Huber vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 0-2
Ginger Helgeson holds a 2–0 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ginger Helgeson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1994 Australian Open third round 3-6 7-6(10) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 3-6 7-6(10) 6-4 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1991* | Palm Springs | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Anke Huber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anke Huber | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |