H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anke Huber vs Iva Majoli H2H: 4-4

Anke Huber and Iva Majoli are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–2 on carpet, while Iva Majoli leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1998 US Open first round 6-3 6-3.

GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Iva Majoli #21 6-3 6-3 Anke Huber #19 Match data
Nov 17, 1997 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Iva Majoli #6 7-6 7-6 Anke Huber #12 Match data
Nov 13, 1997* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Anke Huber #12 6-3 1-6 6-3 Iva Majoli #6 Match data
Sep 27, 1997* Leipzig WTA 250 QF Carpet Anke Huber #7 4-6 7-6 6-4 Iva Majoli #4 Match data
Apr 4, 1997* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Anke Huber #7 3-6 7-6 6-3 Iva Majoli #10 Match data
Nov 18, 1996 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Iva Majoli #7 7-5 6-2 Anke Huber #6 Match data
Oct 6, 1996* Leipzig WTA 250 F Carpet Anke Huber #6 5-7 6-3 6-1 Iva Majoli #4 Match data
Oct 29, 1994* Essen WTA 250 QF Hard Iva Majoli #19 2-6 6-3 6-1 Anke Huber #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,157 259 190 57.7% 1 3 0 0 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,736 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,922 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,046 0 2
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1996 39–16 70.9% #8 2,040 0 4
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,947 1 7
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 2000 11–10 52.4% #62 1,703 1 7
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,668 1 8
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,589 1 8
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,564 1 8