H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Iva Majoli H2H: 4-4

Anke Huber and Iva Majoli are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–2 on carpet, while Iva Majoli leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1998 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main-draw meetings
Iva Majoli
CRO Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Iva Majoli #21 6-3 6-3 Anke Huber #19 Match data Sep 2, 1998* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Iva Majoli #6 7-6 7-6 Anke Huber #12 Match data Nov 17, 1997 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Anke Huber #12 6-3 1-6 6-3 Iva Majoli #6 Match data Nov 13, 1997* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anke Huber #7 4-6 7-6 6-4 Iva Majoli #4 Match data Sep 27, 1997* QF Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anke Huber #7 3-6 7-6 6-3 Iva Majoli #10 Match data Apr 4, 1997* R16 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Iva Majoli #7 7-5 6-2 Anke Huber #6 Match data Nov 18, 1996 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Anke Huber #6 5-7 6-3 6-1 Iva Majoli #4 Match data Oct 6, 1996* F Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Iva Majoli #19 2-6 6-3 6-1 Anke Huber #13 Match data Oct 29, 1994* QF Essen Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,155 262 192 57.7% 1 3 0 4 0 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,735 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,921 0 0
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,045 0 2
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1996 42–17 71.2% #7 2,038 0 4
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,946 1 7
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 2000 11–11 50.0% #62 1,695 1 7
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,667 1 8
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,606 1 8
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,579 1 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Iva Majoli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 16 7 23 69.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1995 14 3 17 82.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 4 19 78.9%
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1997 8 9 17 47.1% 19 4 23 82.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1998 6 5 11 54.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2000 5 5 10 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 0 6 6 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 85 81 166 51.2% 105 58 163 64.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 61 43 104 58.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Iva Majoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 1992 1624 131.4 — — — — -1 -35 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.26
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 1993 1736 154.2 — — — — -24 -82 — 51.7% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 -0.69
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 1994 1922 155.6 — — — — -47 -71 -318 58.8% +0.37 18–6 (75%) 10–2 (83%) 116.4 -1.10
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 1995 2046 165.8 — — — — 0 -128 — 66.7% +1.21 8–6 (57%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 -0.04
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 1996 2038 166.9 — — — — +33 -42 -404 65.7% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–4 (73%) 105.7 -1.43
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1997 1946 159.5 — — — — -16 +184 -241 60.5% +0.66 20–9 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 106.3 +1.31
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1998 1829 148.6 — — — — -4 +251 — 52.7% 0.00 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 99.1 -0.16
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1999 1694 121.9 — — — — +5 +287 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.20
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 2000 1695 114.9 — — — — -4 +192 — 42.3% -0.77 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 -0.36
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 2001 1697 138.2 — — — — +23 +107 — 49.5% -0.19 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 -0.47
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 2002 1668 129.8 — — — — -45 +156 +61 51.9% -0.21 8–10 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 95.6 +0.77
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 2003 1607 113.3 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -55 +133 — 35.3% -1.04 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 96.9 -0.94
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 2004 1579 102.6 — — — — -48 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 — — -0.23
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 2155 156.1 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -9 +79 -234 55.0% +0.17 99–66 (60%) 62–43 (59%) 109.1 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.