H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anke Huber vs Janet Lee H2H: 3-0
Anke Huber holds a 3–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1998 Key Biscayne second round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anke Huber | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Janet Lee | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-1 | Janet Lee | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-1 6-2 | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |