H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Janet Lee H2H: 3-0

Anke Huber holds a 3–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1998 Key Biscayne round of 64 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Janet Lee
TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #14 2-6 6-4 6-4 Janet Lee #91 Match data Mar 21, 1998* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #8 6-2 6-1 Janet Lee #121 Match data Aug 28, 1997* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Anke Huber #10 6-1 6-2 Janet Lee #235 Match data Mar 19, 1995* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,570 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Janet Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,513 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,525 0 0
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,498 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,487 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,514 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,555 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,524 0 0
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,511 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,495 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Janet Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1998 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 2000 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 26 46 72 36.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Janet Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 1993 1492 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.01
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 1994 1508 115.6 — — — — +41 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 — — -0.45
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 1995 1519 101.0 — — — — +57 +14 — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.04
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1996 1514 120.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.48
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1997 1526 105.6 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -1.13 2–0 0–1 — +0.41
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1998 1499 121.5 — — — — +38 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.18
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 1999 1488 111.5 — — — — +57 -62 — 38.2% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.61
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 2000 1515 113.7 — — — — +33 — — 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.34
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 2001 1556 116.3 — — — — +6 — — 47.2% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +0.01
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 2002 1525 103.5 — — — — +30 — — 13.3% -2.93 1–0 1–1 — -0.90
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 2003 1512 102.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% — — +13 33.3% -0.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 1571 119.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +36 -24 +13 34.3% -1.01 10–16 (38%) 7–12 (37%) 93.8 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.