H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anke Huber vs Jo Durie H2H: 3-1
Anke Huber holds a 3–1 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anke Huber leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 65
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anke Huber | 7-5 6-2 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| May 28, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jo Durie | 6-1 7-5 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| May 1, 1992* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-3 6-2 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anke Huber | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Jo Durie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,099 | 314 | 264 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Jo Durie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 |