H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anke Huber vs Karin Kschwendt H2H: 2-0
Anke Huber holds a 2–0 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1996 Strasbourg fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1996* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anke Huber | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-2 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Karin Kschwendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |