H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Karina Habsudova H2H: 2-3

Karina Habsudova holds a 3–2 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Karina Habsudova leads 3–0 on clay, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Karina Habsudova won the 1999 Portschach quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Karina Habsudova
SVK Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karina Habsudova #67 6-4 6-2 Anke Huber #31 Match data Jul 10, 1999* QF Portschach Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anke Huber #4 6-3 6-0 Karina Habsudova #17 Match data Oct 27, 1996* F Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Anke Huber #5 7-6 6-3 Karina Habsudova #21 Match data Aug 17, 1996* SF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Karina Habsudova #26 7-5 6-3 Anke Huber #5 Match data Jun 4, 1996* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Karina Habsudova #54 6-4 6-1 Anke Huber #5 Match data May 18, 1996* QF Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 172 174 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Karina Habsudova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1996 38–22 63.3% #11 1,858 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,755 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,685 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,762 0 1
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 2000 14–20 41.2% #85 1,672 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Karina Habsudova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1993 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1994 7 5 12 58.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1996 18 9 27 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1997 7 8 15 46.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2000 10 8 18 55.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 81 74 155 52.3% 63 51 114 55.3% 5 14 19 26.3% 23 35 58 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Karina Habsudova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.97 1990 1536 111.6 — — — — +46 — — 71.4% +0.71 0–1 — — +0.07
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.03 1991 1671 136.1 — — — — +23 -123 — 45.5% -0.32 6–2 (75%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.26
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.91 1992 1663 140.8 — — — — +26 -85 — 41.5% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) — -1.32
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.55 1993 1628 125.7 — — — — +14 -50 — 46.8% -0.19 1–8 (11%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.06
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.78 1994 1796 152.2 — — — — -42 -99 — 54.2% +0.44 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) — -1.38
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) — +2.81 1995 1732 138.3 — — — — -6 -18 — 54.1% +0.26 2–5 (29%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.36
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.85 1996 1858 158.9 — — — — -42 +41 — 59.1% +0.66 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.42
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86 1997 1756 144.1 — — — — +44 +38 -146 50.0% +0.07 7–7 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.12
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.51 1998 1685 132.5 — — — — +56 +60 — 40.0% -0.83 4–6 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -2.04
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.44 1999 1763 138.7 — — — — -39 +74 -212 56.6% +0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) — -1.31
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.22 2000 1673 123.7 — — — — +62 +17 — 42.7% -0.65 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.77
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1621 107.3 — — — — +71 +3 — 37.8% -0.87 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.16
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 1953 148.2 — — — — +10 +8 -174 49.9% -0.03 52–53 (50%) 33–27 (55%) 103.8 -2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.