H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anke Huber vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 2-1
Anke Huber holds a 2–1 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kristie Boogert | 6-4 6-4 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1996* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1994* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-2 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Kristie Boogert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |