H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anke Huber vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-1
Anke Huber and Laura Arraya are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1991 Sydney second round 1-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1991* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1990* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |