H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anke Huber vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 3-3

Anke Huber and Leila Meskhi are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1994 US Open second round 6-2 6-2.

GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Leila Meskhi #37 6-2 6-2 Anke Huber #16 Match data
May 29, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Anke Huber #10 6-1 6-4 Leila Meskhi #32 Match data
Jan 19, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Anke Huber #10 6-1 6-3 Leila Meskhi #31 Match data
Jan 13, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Leila Meskhi #37 6-7 6-2 6-1 Anke Huber #10 Match data
Oct 16, 1992* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Anke Huber #9 4-6 4-0 (ret.) Leila Meskhi #22 Match data
Feb 9, 1990* Wellington WTA 250 R16 Hard Leila Meskhi #21 7-5 6-2 Anke Huber #135 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 2,001 192 119 61.7% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1988 17–17 50.0% #46 1,688 0 0
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,937 0 4
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1992 26–15 63.4% #22 1,939 0 4
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,874 0 4
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,843 0 4
27 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,834 0 5
28 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,748 0 5