H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anke Huber vs Liz Smylie H2H: 1-0
Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1991 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1991* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anke Huber | 6-1 6-4 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Liz Smylie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 |