H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Anke Huber vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 5-1

Anke Huber holds a 5–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1997 Key Biscayne second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anke Huber #8 6-3 6-3 Lori Mcneil #105 Match data
Nov 11, 1995* Philadelphia WTA 1000 SF Carpet Lori Mcneil #63 6-4 6-7 7-6 Anke Huber #12 Match data
Feb 4, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Anke Huber #9 6-4 2-6 7-5 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data
Aug 20, 1993* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anke Huber #10 4-6 6-3 7-6 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data
May 27, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Anke Huber #10 6-1 3-6 7-5 Lori Mcneil #23 Match data
Oct 17, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Anke Huber #21 6-4 6-1 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11