H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anke Huber vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-1
Anke Huber holds a 3–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1996 Philadelphia fourth round 2-6 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1996* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 2-6 7-6 6-1 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1995* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-1 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1994* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Anke Huber | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1990* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anke Huber | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |