H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-1

Anke Huber holds a 3–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1996 Philadelphia round of 16 2-6 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 2-6 7-6 6-1 Anke Huber #5 Match data Nov 15, 1996* R16 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anke Huber #10 6-2 6-1 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Oct 12, 1995* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anke Huber #15 4-6 6-2 6-3 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Oct 15, 1994* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anke Huber #118 6-1 5-7 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Aug 26, 1990* F Schenectady Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,850 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Anke Huber Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,541 0 1
1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,586 0 1
1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,592 0 1
1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,745 0 1
1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,739 0 1
1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,773 0 1
2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,787 0 1
— — — — — — — 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,665 0 1
— — — — — — — 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,673 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Anke Huber Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1986 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1988 9 16 25 36.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1989 11 14 25 44.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1990 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1993 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 10 13 23.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% Career 125 129 254 49.2% 7 20 27 25.9% 11 20 31 35.5% 33 33 66 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Anke Huber Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 1983 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.02
1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 1984 1478 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.29
1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 1985 1542 112.3 — — — — +15 — — 63.2% +0.89 1–0 0–1 — +0.37
1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 1986 1683 123.1 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.34 8–2 (80%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.30
1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 1987 1659 129.2 — — — — +44 — -85 41.9% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.83
1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1988 1587 119.6 — — — — +2 — -37 37.3% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.05
1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1989 1592 119.9 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.25 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +2.41
1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1990 1746 136.3 — — — — +8 -257 — 51.7% +0.10 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 103.1 -0.70
1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 1991 1740 132.5 — — — — +15 -243 -169 48.9% -0.13 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 103.3 +0.98
1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 1992 1697 133.3 — — — — +32 — -146 48.5% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.1 +0.32
1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 1993 1749 139.9 — — — — +28 -270 -150 51.6% +0.31 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 -0.37
2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 1994 1773 143.7 — — — — +15 -260 -181 48.5% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.29
2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 1995 1788 149.0 — — — — +45 -292 — 54.1% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +0.06
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1666 124.9 — — — — +54 -192 — 31.6% -1.28 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.43
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1673 119.1 — — — — +35 — — 52.6% +0.37 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
Career 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 Career 1850 139.7 — — — — +22 -251 -124 47.3% -0.20 63–57 (53%) 39–25 (61%) 108.6 +0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.