H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Anke Huber vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 2-1

Anke Huber holds a 2–1 lead over Martina Navratilova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Martina Navratilova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1994 Filderstadt quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Anke Huber #15 6-3 3-6 6-4 Martina Navratilova #5 Match data
Oct 20, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 F Hard Anke Huber #21 2-6 6-2 7-6 Martina Navratilova #4 Match data
May 10, 1991* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Martina Navratilova #4 3-6 6-1 6-3 Anke Huber #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 — — — — — — — 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 — — — — — — — 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 — — — — — — — 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 — — — — — — — 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 — — — — — — — 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 — — — — — — — 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168