H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anke Huber vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 3-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–3 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1997 Zurich third round 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 1997* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anke Huber #11 7-5 6-0 Mary Joe Fernandez #12 Match data
Oct 9, 1997* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-4 6-4 Anke Huber #8 Match data
Aug 16, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 SF Hard Anke Huber #8 3-6 6-2 (ret.) Mary Joe Fernandez #13 Match data
May 8, 1993* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) Anke Huber #11 Match data
Mar 6, 1993* Delray Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Anke Huber #11 6-4 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #7 Match data
Oct 17, 1992* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 5-7 6-3 6-1 Anke Huber #9 Match data
May 9, 1992* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #7 3-6 7-6 6-3 Anke Huber #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7