H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anke Huber vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-4

Miriam Oremans holds a 4–1 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Miriam Oremans leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1997 Rosmalen semifinal 4-6 6-4 RET.

GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 1997* Rosmalen WTA 250 SF Grass Miriam Oremans #78 4-6 6-4 (ret.) Anke Huber #8 Match data
Feb 21, 1997* Hanover WTA 250 R16 Carpet Miriam Oremans #53 6-0 5-7 6-4 Anke Huber #7 Match data
Feb 23, 1996* Essen WTA 250 R16 Carpet Anke Huber #5 6-4 6-7 6-4 Miriam Oremans #46 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Miriam Oremans #75 6-3 6-1 Anke Huber #14 Match data
Mar 15, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Miriam Oremans #78 7-5 5-7 6-2 Anke Huber #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0