H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anke Huber vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 6-1

Anke Huber holds a 6–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Rome second round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anke Huber #12 6-4 7-5 Natasha Zvereva #35 Match data
Oct 14, 1999* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anke Huber #21 6-2 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #24 Match data
Jan 19, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Anke Huber #7 7-5 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #56 Match data
Oct 26, 1996* Luxembourg WTA 250 QF Carpet Anke Huber #4 6-1 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #30 Match data
Oct 18, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Anke Huber #21 6-2 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #19 Match data
Aug 29, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Natasha Zvereva #21 6-2 6-4 Anke Huber #19 Match data
Jan 23, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Anke Huber #35 6-3 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5