H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anke Huber vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 2-0
Anke Huber holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1995 Canadian Open third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-4 6-3 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
| May 13, 1993* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Anke Huber | 7-6 6-3 | Nicole Bradtke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Nicole Bradtke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |