H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Anke Huber vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 1-0
Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics fourth round 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 59
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R16 | Clay | Anke Huber | 7-5 7-6(3) | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,122 | 398 | 205 | 66.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 81 | 100 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #11 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,059 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,028 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,082 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,031 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,872 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #115 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,896 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |