H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anke Huber vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-1
Anke Huber and Rachel Mcquillan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1991 Hamburg third round 6-7 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1991* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1990* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rachel Mcquillan | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Anke Huber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Rachel Mcquillan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |