H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-1

Anke Huber and Rachel Mcquillan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1991 Hamburg Open round of 32 6-7 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #23 6-7 7-6 6-4 Rachel Mcquillan #49 Match data May 2, 1991* R32 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Rachel Mcquillan #39 2-6 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #32 Match data Oct 18, 1990* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Rachel Mcquillan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Rachel Mcquillan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.