H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anke Huber vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 2-1
Anke Huber holds a 2–1 lead over Rita Kuti-Kis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2001 Strasbourg quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2001* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-4 6-4 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1999* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rita Kuti-Kis | 7-6 6-1 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1998* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anke Huber | 7-5 6-2 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Rita Kuti-Kis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |