H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anke Huber vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 5-1

Anke Huber holds a 5–1 lead over Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2001 Paris fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2001* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Anke Huber #16 6-2 6-4 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Oct 22, 1999* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Anke Huber #19 6-3 4-6 6-3 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anke Huber #29 6-4 7-6 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Oct 15, 1998* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 3-6 6-4 6-4 Anke Huber #20 Match data
Oct 4, 1996* Leipzig WTA 250 R16 Carpet Anke Huber #6 6-1 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Jun 22, 1996* Rosmalen WTA 250 SF Grass Anke Huber #5 6-7 6-1 6-4 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,961 186 180 50.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 — — — — — — —
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,589 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,664 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1996 31–15 67.4% — 1,849 0 3
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,832 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 2000 20–24 45.5% — 1,685 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,547 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,515 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,508 0 4