H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anke Huber vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 5-2

Anke Huber holds a 5–2 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Hamburg fourth round 6-1 6-3.

GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 4, 2000* Hamburg WTA 500 R16 Clay Anke Huber #14 6-1 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #25 Match data
Mar 22, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anke Huber #14 6-7 6-4 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #20 Match data
Jun 21, 1997* Rosmalen WTA 250 QF Grass Anke Huber #8 6-2 4-6 7-6 Sabine Appelmans #19 Match data
Feb 14, 1997* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Anke Huber #7 6-3 6-2 Sabine Appelmans #18 Match data
Jun 4, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Anke Huber #11 6-0 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #37 Match data
Feb 12, 1994* Linz WTA 500 QF Carpet Sabine Appelmans #30 4-6 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #10 Match data
Sep 2, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sabine Appelmans #21 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7