H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anke Huber vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–1 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1994 Styria semifinal 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 1994* Styria WTA 250 SF Clay Anke Huber #16 6-3 7-6 Sandra Cecchini #50 Match data
May 14, 1992* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #40 1-6 6-2 6-0 Anke Huber #10 Match data
Jun 2, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #22 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 — — — — — — — 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11