H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anke Huber vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 4-0
Anke Huber holds a 4–0 lead over Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Montreal third round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2000* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1998* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anke Huber | 5-7 6-0 6-0 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-2 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Anke Huber | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |