H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 4-0

Anke Huber holds a 4–0 lead over Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Canadian Open round of 32 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #10 4-6 6-1 6-4 Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #47 Match data Aug 17, 2000* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #14 5-7 6-0 6-0 Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #62 Match data Jan 21, 1998* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Anke Huber #5 6-2 6-2 Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #123 Match data Jun 2, 1996* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Anke Huber #10 7-6(5) 6-3 Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #141 Match data May 26, 1993* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #739 #29 917 1,771 109 123 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 1993 1–3 25.0% #167 1,500 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 1994 2–5 28.6% #122 1,501 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1995 7–12 36.8% #94 1,499 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1996 12–12 50.0% #85 1,604 0 0
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1997 14–17 45.2% #57 1,621 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1998 21–21 50.0% #33 1,723 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1999 28–21 57.1% #36 1,708 0 1
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 2000 19–19 50.0% #65 1,685 0 1
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 2001 5–13 27.8% #160 1,584 0 1
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 1993 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1995 3 6 9 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1996 3 3 6 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1998 8 8 16 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 16 7 23 69.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 32 45 77 41.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 17 16 33 51.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.03 1993 1500 99.2 — — — — — +21 — 22.2% -1.11 1–0 0–1 — -0.37
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.91 1994 1501 106.6 — — — — +33 +24 — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.18
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.55 1995 1499 114.1 — — — — +22 +53 — 41.3% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +1.84
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.78 1996 1605 116.8 — — — — -51 +10 — 49.1% -0.17 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.63
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) — +2.81 1997 1622 127.2 — — — — -60 +70 -53 42.3% -0.52 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.34
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.85 1998 1723 142.2 — — — — -8 +16 -196 51.5% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) — -2.23
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86 1999 1708 133.4 — — — — -20 +50 -170 53.7% +0.36 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.32
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.51 2000 1685 129.4 — — — — +41 -11 -131 49.4% -0.17 8–3 (73%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.58
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.44 2001 1584 110.0 — — — — +63 +22 — 35.7% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.91
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 1771 132.0 — — — — -2 +30 -126 46.9% -0.27 38–32 (54%) 18–18 (50%) 106.9 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.