H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anke Huber vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 2-0
Anke Huber holds a 2–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1999 Leipzig fourth round 5-7 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1999* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anke Huber | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anke Huber | 2-6 6-2 6-0 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |