H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anke Huber vs Tina Pisnik H2H: 1-0
Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Pisnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-3 | Tina Pisnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Tina Pisnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |