H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Anke Huber vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 3-2

Anke Huber holds a 3–2 lead over Yayuk Basuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Yayuk Basuki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1997 San Diego fourth round 6-2 2-6 6-2.

GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
INA Age 55 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 1997* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Yayuk Basuki #22 6-2 2-6 6-2 Anke Huber #9 Match data
Aug 30, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Anke Huber #10 6-2 6-3 Yayuk Basuki #25 Match data
Jan 22, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Anke Huber #10 6-0 6-1 Yayuk Basuki #27 Match data
Oct 27, 1994* Essen WTA 250 R32 Hard Anke Huber #13 6-3 6-0 Yayuk Basuki #25 Match data
Jun 28, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Yayuk Basuki #51 6-2 6-3 Anke Huber #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Yayuk Basuki #262 #19 1,360 1,940 161 123 56.7% 0 1 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Yayuk Basuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1991 17–11 60.7% #35 1,678 0 1
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1992 16–14 53.3% #48 1,700 0 2
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1993 21–15 58.3% #43 1,723 0 4
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1994 23–12 65.7% #29 1,788 0 6
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1995 18–12 60.0% #24 1,846 0 6
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1996 22–16 57.9% #30 1,853 0 6
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1997 30–22 57.7% #20 1,854 0 6
27 1998 11–16 40.7% #56 1,727 0 6
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #241 1,707 0 6
29 2000 3–4 42.9% #256 1,660 0 6