H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anke Huber vs Zina Garrison H2H: 2-1

Anke Huber holds a 2–1 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1991 Filderstadt quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 19, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Anke Huber #21 6-2 6-1 Zina Garrison #12 Match data
Jul 3, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Zina Garrison #9 4-6 6-3 6-0 Anke Huber #18 Match data
Sep 29, 1990* Bayonne WTA 250 QF Carpet Anke Huber #61 7-5 6-3 Zina Garrison #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 — — — — — — — 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15