H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Grossman vs Elena Makarova H2H: 1-2
Elena Makarova holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Makarova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1995 Hamburg third round 6-1 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 53
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1995* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 6-1 6-7 6-3 | Elena Makarova | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1995* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elena Makarova | 6-2 6-0 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1994* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elena Makarova | 6-7 7-6 6-2 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Makarova | — | — | — | 1,755 | 59 | 72 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Grossman | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |