H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ann Grossman vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-1
Ann Grossman holds a 2–1 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1992 Hilton Head second round 6-2 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1992* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| May 27, 1990* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-2 6-3 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Grossman | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |