H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ann Grossman vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-1

Ann Grossman holds a 2–1 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1992 Hilton Head round of 64 6-2 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Mercedes Paz
ARG Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #45 6-2 2-6 6-2 Mercedes Paz #71 Match data Apr 1, 1992* R64 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Mercedes Paz #71 6-2 6-3 Ann Grossman #64 Match data May 27, 1990* F Strasbourg Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Ann Grossman #54 6-2 4-6 6-3 Mercedes Paz #48 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercedes Paz #521 #28 185 1,822 145 184 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Grossman Mercedes Paz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0 1985 7–11 38.9% #115 1,526 0 1
20 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0 1986 22–23 48.9% #60 1,577 0 1
21 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0 1987 15–20 42.9% #88 1,637 0 1
22 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0 1988 24–15 61.5% #44 1,779 0 2
23 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0 1989 13–19 40.6% #91 1,647 0 2
24 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0 1990 25–20 55.6% #32 1,775 0 3
25 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0 1991 19–23 45.2% #71 1,683 0 3
26 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0 1992 10–19 34.5% #107 1,606 0 3
27 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0 1993 2–11 15.4% #213 1,491 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1994 3–10 23.1% #140 1,474 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1995 4–8 33.3% #164 1,451 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1996 1–5 16.7% #124 1,442 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ann Grossman Mercedes Paz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 8 10 18 44.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 0 6 6 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
25 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0% — 41 57 98 41.8% 93 98 191 48.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 8 17 25 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ann Grossman Mercedes Paz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48 1985 1526 110.7 — — — — +40 +38 — 40.9% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.74
20 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49 1986 1577 119.8 — — — — -30 +125 — 50.5% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +3.38
21 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73 1987 1637 131.6 — — — — -16 +33 — 45.6% -0.18 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.70
22 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77 1988 1780 134.3 — — — — -56 -13 — 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 4–3 (57%) 106.9 +0.57
23 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02 1989 1648 125.8 — — — — -60 +126 — 45.9% -0.22 2–8 (20%) 8–7 (53%) 94.4 +0.43
24 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33 1990 1776 143.2 — — — — -121 +116 — 54.3% +0.15 8–9 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 101.6 -2.36
25 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99 1991 1684 124.3 — — — — +2 +72 — 45.2% -0.53 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +1.48
26 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41 1992 1606 128.7 — — — — -21 +95 — 42.6% -0.54 1–9 (10%) 2–1 (67%) 91.7 -1.41
27 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11 1993 1491 102.6 — — — — +47 +87 — 24.1% -1.38 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.61
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1474 115.3 — — — — +29 +93 — 22.2% -1.81 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1452 102.8 — — — — +50 +58 — 36.0% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1442 97.8 — — — — — +17 — 16.7% -2.67 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45 — 1822 131.0 — — — — -28 +76 — 45.9% -0.29 37–61 (38%) 38–33 (54%) 96.4 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.