H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ann Grossman vs Nana Smith H2H: 3-0
Ann Grossman holds a 3–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1993 Jakarta third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1993* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 7-6 6-3 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1992* | Taipei | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-2 6-0 (ret.) | Nana Smith | Match data |
| May 31, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 6-2 6-3 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Grossman | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |