H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Ann Grossman vs Nana Smith H2H: 3-0

Ann Grossman holds a 3–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1993 Jakarta round of 32 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #42 7-6 6-3 Nana Smith #138 Match data Apr 29, 1993* R32 Jakarta Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Ann Grossman #42 6-2 6-0 (ret.) Nana Smith #192 Match data Sep 30, 1992* SF Taipei Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Ann Grossman #51 6-2 6-3 Nana Smith #59 Match data May 31, 1990* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Grossman Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ann Grossman Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ann Grossman Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.