H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Ann Grossman vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-3

Sandra Cecchini holds a 3–2 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1998 Key Biscayne first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Ann Grossman #99 7-5 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #205 Match data
May 16, 1997* Cardiff WTA 250 R32 Clay Ann Grossman #82 6-4 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #150 Match data
Sep 29, 1994* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sandra Cecchini #39 6-4 6-4 Ann Grossman #31 Match data
May 16, 1991* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #19 6-2 6-2 Ann Grossman #40 Match data
Apr 19, 1990* Tampa WTA 250 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #25 7-5 6-2 Ann Grossman #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,888 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Grossman Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,749 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,636 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,734 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,810 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,664 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11