H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ann Grossman vs Shaun Stafford H2H: 0-2
Shaun Stafford holds a 2–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shaun Stafford leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shaun Stafford won the 1994 Roland Garros third round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Shaun Stafford | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1992* | Taipei | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Shaun Stafford | 6-1 6-3 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shaun Stafford | #803 | #48 | 31 | 1,772 | 90 | 132 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Grossman | Shaun Stafford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #121 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #51 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #150 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #74 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #55 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #97 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #388 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |