H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Stacey Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stacey Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stacey Martin won the 1989 Schenectady round of 16 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacey Martin | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Ann Grossman | Match data | Jul 28, 1989* | R16 | Schenectady | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,887 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stacey Martin | — | — | — | 1,677 | 37 | 59 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Grossman | Stacey Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ann Grossman | Stacey Martin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1988 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1988 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1990 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1991 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1991 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 111 | 106 | 217 | 51.2% | 59 | 56 | 115 | 51.3% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | — | 25 | 36 | 61 | 41.0% | 10 | 17 | 27 | 37.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ann Grossman | Stacey Martin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1987 | 1497 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 | 1987 | 1491 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 17 | 1988 | 1699 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 54.1% | +0.13 | 4–3 (57%) | 0–5 (0%) | 100.1 | +0.16 | 1988 | 1561 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 48.0% | -0.28 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.49 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1737 | 136.2 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -89 | — | 52.5% | +0.05 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.2 | -1.22 | 1989 | 1613 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -79 | — | 45.5% | -0.33 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–1 | — | -0.27 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1749 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | -12 | +8 | — | 51.0% | +0.02 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -1.48 | 1990 | 1575 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -19 | — | 42.6% | -0.47 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.9 | +0.10 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1638 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | -16 | +89 | — | 44.3% | +0.06 | 3–7 (30%) | 2–6 (25%) | 91.9 | +0.49 | 1991 | 1552 | 114.5 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +2 | — | 38.3% | -0.83 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 95.7 | +0.49 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1733 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -9 | — | 52.9% | -0.03 | 6–3 (67%) | 6–1 (86%) | 108.7 | +1.73 | 1992 | 1528 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +13 | — | 21.4% | -2.36 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.30 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1805 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -60 | — | 59.6% | +0.62 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.6 | +0.77 | 1993 | 1516 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.04 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1853 | 146.2 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -73 | -249 | 53.6% | -0.01 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–2 (71%) | 107.3 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 1681 | 123.7 | — | — | — | — | +38 | +44 | — | 40.8% | -0.46 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–9 (25%) | 92.7 | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 1666 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +49 | +8 | — | 42.9% | -0.62 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 1615 | 123.7 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +98 | — | 38.6% | -1.25 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.1 | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 1595 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | +41 | +76 | — | 33.3% | -1.58 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1888 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +6 | -249 | 49.9% | -0.10 | 53–53 (50%) | 31–39 (44%) | 99.5 | -0.45 | — | 1678 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -21 | — | 41.1% | -0.68 | 12–16 (43%) | 3–9 (25%) | 94.6 | +1.20 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 3, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 7 | 7 | May 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Katerina Maleeva | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 1, 1994 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 23, 1996 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Ann Henricksson | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Erika De Lone | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 19, 1991 | H2H |