H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Ann Grossman vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 2-4

Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 4–2 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1995 Wimbledon round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-1 6-4 Ann Grossman #50 Match data Jun 30, 1995* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-4 6-0 Ann Grossman #36 Match data Apr 14, 1995* R16 Houston Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Tami Whitlinger Jones 7-5 6-1 Ann Grossman #40 Match data Jul 29, 1994* R32 Stratton Mountain Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Ann Grossman #37 6-0 4-6 6-4 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Jun 23, 1993* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ann Grossman #76 7-6(9) 7-6(0) Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Feb 21, 1992* R16 Oklahoma Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tami Whitlinger Jones 7-6(7) 6-4 Ann Grossman #63 Match data Jun 2, 1991* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Grossman Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0
22 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0
24 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0
25 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0
26 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0
27 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ann Grossman Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0% — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ann Grossman Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
18 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49
21 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78
22 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08
23 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65
24 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72
25 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10
26 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16
27 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98
Career — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45 — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.