H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ann Henricksson vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 3-0
Ann Henricksson holds a 3–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Henricksson leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1987 Phoenix fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ann Henricksson | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1987* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Ann Henricksson | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1986* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ann Henricksson | 6-2 6-2 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Henricksson | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |