H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ann Henricksson vs Eva Krapl H2H: 1-3
Eva Krapl holds a 3–1 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Eva Krapl leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Ann Henricksson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1989 Taipei third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1989* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 6-4 7-6 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1989* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 5-7 7-6 6-4 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1986* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ann Henricksson | 8-6 7-6 6-3 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Henricksson | Eva Krapl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |