H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ann Henricksson vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-2
Helen Kelesi holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1990 Scottsdale third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1990* | Scottsdale | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Henricksson | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1989* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Helen Kelesi | 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1989* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 6-1 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Henricksson | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |