H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Henricksson vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-2
Mercedes Paz holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Mercedes Paz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1991 Indianapolis fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1991* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 7-5 6-2 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1990* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mercedes Paz | 6-3 7-6 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1990* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Ann Henricksson | 7-6 7-6 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Henricksson | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |