H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Ann Henricksson vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Ann Henricksson holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Henricksson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1988 Eastbourne Open round of 32 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Henricksson
USA Age 66
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Henricksson #83 4-6 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #79 Match data Jun 16, 1988* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Henricksson #892 #36 21 1,755 147 210 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Henricksson Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1980 3–5 37.5% — 1,498 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1981 1–4 20.0% — 1,478 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1982 5–6 45.5% — 1,522 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1983 9–19 32.1% — 1,540 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1984 13–16 44.8% #40 1,658 0 0 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1985 18–22 45.0% #36 1,697 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1986 20–21 48.8% #49 1,691 0 0 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1987 17–23 42.5% #60 1,652 0 0 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1988 15–19 44.1% #71 1,647 0 0 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1989 18–21 46.2% #53 1,676 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1990 11–19 36.7% #114 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1991 8–13 38.1% #142 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1992 0–6 0.0% #272 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1993 5–9 35.7% #141 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1994 4–7 36.4% #215 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ann Henricksson Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1981 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1985 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 7 10 30.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1988 3 11 14 21.4% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1989 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 54 94 148 36.5% 9 20 29 31.0% 57 49 106 53.8% 27 47 74 36.5% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ann Henricksson Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1980 1499 103.6 — — — — — +3 +85 41.2% -1.35 0–1 — — +0.35 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1981 1479 107.0 — — — — — +41 — 27.3% -1.46 0–1 1–1 — +0.34 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1982 1523 114.8 — — — — +33 0 — 38.1% -0.95 1–0 — — -0.02 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1983 1541 115.5 — — — — 0 -4 +70 33.8% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.4 +1.02 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1984 1659 129.1 — — — — -145 -134 +106 46.9% -0.42 2–4 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 102.6 +0.30 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1985 1698 131.9 — — — — -127 — +89 47.9% -0.26 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 101.0 +1.52 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1986 1692 127.5 — — — — -41 -178 +86 48.3% -0.36 7–4 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +1.06 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1987 1652 125.5 — — — — -15 -155 +68 41.5% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 2–9 (18%) 100.7 -0.53 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1988 1647 128.7 — — — — -58 — +101 45.5% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +0.89 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1989 1676 133.3 — — — — -49 — +86 45.6% -0.20 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 99.5 +0.99 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
30 1990 1628 118.2 — — — — -73 — +176 37.1% -1.06 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.2 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1597 121.1 — — — — -38 — +179 39.6% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1525 101.7 — — — — -19 — — 20.0% -2.33 0–3 (0%) — — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1542 121.7 — — — — -1 — — 45.5% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1531 101.5 — — — — -10 — — 30.4% -1.52 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 130.0 — — — — -50 -58 +100 42.3% -0.52 56–55 (50%) 36–50 (42%) 101.3 +1.29 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.