H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Henricksson vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0
Ann Henricksson holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Henricksson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1985 Melbourne third round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1985* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ann Henricksson | 7-6 7-5 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Henricksson | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |