H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ann Jones vs Annette Van Zyl H2H: 5-0
Ann Jones holds a 5–0 lead over Annette Van Zyl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ann Jones leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1969 Perth Scotland semifinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1969* | Perth Scotland | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Ann Jones | 6-1 6-3 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1969* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Ann Jones | 6-4 6-2 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1968* | Dublin | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Ann Jones | 6-4 6-3 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1968* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ann Jones | 6-3 6-4 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1968* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Ann Jones | 7-5 6-3 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Jones | — | — | — | 2,178 | 254 | 64 | 79.9% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 28 |
| Annette Van Zyl | — | — | — | 1,900 | 107 | 46 | 69.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Jones | Annette Van Zyl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 49–12 | 80.3% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1968 | 41–10 | 80.4% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1969 | 74–15 | 83.1% | — | 2,044 | 1 | 9 | 1974 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1970 | 75–16 | 82.4% | — | 2,104 | 1 | 18 | 1975 | 11–1 | 91.7% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1971 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 2,166 | 1 | 20 | 1976 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | 1974 | 6–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,173 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1975 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 2,106 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1978 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 2,026 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 2,001 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,970 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,940 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,910 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |