H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Ann Jones vs Joyce Williams H2H: 7-0

Ann Jones holds a 7–0 lead over Joyce Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Ann Jones leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1970 London round of 16 6-4 3-6 7-6(3).

GBR Age 87 Left-Handed
H2H
7 0
7 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Jones 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) Joyce Williams Match data Nov 16, 1970* R16 London WTA 250 Carpet
Ann Jones 8-6 4-6 6-4 Joyce Williams Match data Oct 18, 1970* QF Edinburgh WTA 250 Carpet
Ann Jones 6-4 6-4 Joyce Williams Match data Jun 7, 1970* F Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Ann Jones 1-6 6-2 6-3 Joyce Williams Match data May 30, 1970* SF Surbiton WTA 250 Grass
Ann Jones 6-1 4-6 6-4 Joyce Williams Match data May 17, 1970* F Fulham WTA 250 Clay
Ann Jones 6-1 6-3 Joyce Williams Match data Apr 25, 1970* SF Sutton WTA 250 Clay
Ann Jones 6-3 6-4 Joyce Williams Match data Nov 22, 1969* R16 Wembley WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Jones 2,198 254 64 79.9% 1 0 0 0 26 27
Joyce Williams 1,971 188 88 68.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Jones Joyce Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 35–20 63.6% 1,627 0 1
24 1969 36–20 64.3% 1,790 0 2
25 1970 46–17 73.0% 1,860 0 5
26 1971 23–12 65.7% 1,916 0 6
27 1972 30–8 78.9% 1,939 0 8
28 1973 5–4 55.6% 1,866 0 8
29 1968 41–10 80.4% 1,852 0 1 1974 1–3 25.0% 1,847 0 8
30 1969 74–15 83.1% 2,045 1 8 1975 5–1 83.3% 1,863 0 10
31 1970 75–16 82.4% 2,106 1 17 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,841 0 10
32 1971 32–12 72.7% 2,188 1 19
34 1979 7–2 77.8% 1,824 0 10
35 1974 6–0 100.0% 2,194 1 21
36 1975 8–1 88.9% 2,177 1 24
38 1977 8–2 80.0% 2,124 1 27
39 1978 7–3 70.0% 2,073 1 27
40 1979 3–1 75.0% 2,046 1 27
41 1980 0–1 0.0% 2,015 1 27
42 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,985 1 27
43 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,954 1 27
44 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,924 1 27

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ann Jones Joyce Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 1968 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 13 8 21 61.9% 12 6 18 66.7%
24 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 16 10 26 61.5% 10 7 17 58.8%
25 1970 2 1 3 66.7% 19 4 23 82.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2%
26 1971 9 5 14 64.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
27 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 13 3 16 81.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
28 1973 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1968 5 2 7 71.4% 13 3 16 81.3% 21 4 25 84.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 1969 12 4 16 75.0% 23 3 26 88.5% 26 4 30 86.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1975 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1970 22 4 26 84.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 22 2 24 91.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 1976 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1971 9 0 9 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 22 10 32 68.8%
34 1979 4 1 5 80.0%
35 1974 2 0 2 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
36 1975 3 1 4 75.0% 1 0 1 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
38 1977 4 2 6 66.7%
39 1978 1 1 2 50.0%
41 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
43 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
44 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 48 10 58 82.8% 56 12 68 82.4% 74 15 89 83.1% 63 23 86 73.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 63 21 84 75.0% 68 38 106 64.2% 43 24 67 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ann Jones Joyce Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 1968 1627 120.2 +50 -54 +16 60.5% +0.82 7–4 (64%) -0.49
24 1969 1791 139.2 -16 -45 -22 64.0% +1.31 3–5 (38%) -2.77
25 1970 1860 148.3 +2 +76 -31 70.6% +1.70 6–6 (50%) 0–1 -0.69
26 1971 1916 145.9 -2 +19 63.8% +1.09 5–5 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -3.52
27 1972 1940 143.0 -65 +57 +25 74.4% +1.87 6–4 (60%) 3–0 (100%) 102.7 +0.35
28 1973 1866 117.7 +112 +57 59.1% +1.18 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.76
29 1968 1852 142.7 -158 -98 +30 79.0% +2.42 6–3 (67%) -1.57 1974 1848 116.4 -33 25.0% -0.38 0–2 -0.62
30 1969 2046 162.9 +42 -69 +76 81.4% +2.95 6–10 (38%) -4.73 1975 1864 125.8 76.9% +3.00 1–0 +0.14
31 1970 2107 161.2 +110 -64 +143 77.7% +2.37 13–7 (65%) 2–2 (50%) 102.7 -6.10 1976 1841 99.3 33.3% -0.33 0–1 +0.01
32 1971 2188 160.4 +134 70.8% +1.55 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 105.3 -3.37
34 1979 1825 119.8 +146 70.0% +1.70 2–0 2–1 (67%) +1.13
35 1974 2195 126.8 +102 100.0% +4.25 1–0 +0.69
36 1975 2177 133.3 +89 -156 84.2% +3.68 1–0 0–1 +1.04
38 1977 2125 120.2 +5 81.0% +2.19 0–1 +0.49
39 1978 2073 122.1 82.4% +2.82 1–0 1–1 +0.42
40 1979 2046 117.3 77.8% +2.89 0–1 +0.06
41 1980 2016 98.5 0.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.03
42 1981 1985 98.9 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.01
43 1982 1954 95.7 0.0% -4.00 +0.10
44 1983 1924 91.5 0.0% -5.50 +0.08
Career 2199 159.7 +81 -81 +76 78.0% +2.45 33–24 (58%) 9–8 (53%) 99.5 -4.11 1971 143.4 +2 +30 +3 65.9% +1.37 31–28 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 101.6 -2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.