H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Jones vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 1-0
Ann Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Pericoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Jones leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1969 Rome quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1969* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Ann Jones | 6-1 6-2 | Lea Pericoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Jones | — | — | — | 2,178 | 254 | 64 | 79.9% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 28 |
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Jones | Lea Pericoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 29 | 1968 | 41–10 | 80.4% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1969 | 74–15 | 83.1% | — | 2,044 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1970 | 75–16 | 82.4% | — | 2,104 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1971 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 2,166 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 1974 | 6–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,173 | 1 | 22 | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 1975 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 2,106 | 1 | 28 | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 |
| 39 | 1978 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 2,026 | 1 | 28 | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 |
| 40 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 2,001 | 1 | 28 | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 |
| 41 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,970 | 1 | 28 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |
| 42 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,940 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,910 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |