H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ann Jones vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 1-0

Ann Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Jones leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1968 US Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Jones
GBR Age 87 Left-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Jones 6-3 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 1, 1968* R64 US Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Jones — — — 2,198 254 64 79.9% 1 0 0 0 26 27
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Jones Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1968 41–10 80.4% — 1,852 0 1 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 1969 74–15 83.1% — 2,045 1 8 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 1970 75–16 82.4% — 2,106 1 17 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 1971 32–12 72.7% — 2,188 1 19 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4
35 1974 6–0 100.0% — 2,194 1 21 — — — — — — —
36 1975 8–1 88.9% — 2,177 1 24 — — — — — — —
38 1977 8–2 80.0% — 2,124 1 27 — — — — — — —
39 1978 7–3 70.0% — 2,073 1 27 — — — — — — —
40 1979 3–1 75.0% — 2,046 1 27 — — — — — — —
41 1980 0–1 0.0% — 2,015 1 27 — — — — — — —
42 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,985 1 27 — — — — — — —
43 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,954 1 27 — — — — — — —
44 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,924 1 27 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ann Jones Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1968 5 2 7 71.4% 13 3 16 81.3% 21 4 25 84.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 1969 12 4 16 75.0% 23 3 26 88.5% 26 4 30 86.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1970 22 4 26 84.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 22 2 24 91.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 1971 9 0 9 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 22 10 32 68.8% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 1974 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 0 1 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1977 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 10 58 82.8% 56 12 68 82.4% 74 15 89 83.1% 63 23 86 73.3% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ann Jones Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1968 1852 142.7 — — — — -158 -98 +30 79.0% +2.42 6–3 (67%) — — -1.57 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 1969 2046 162.9 — — — — +42 -69 +76 81.4% +2.95 6–10 (38%) — — -4.73 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 1970 2107 161.2 — — — — +110 -64 +143 77.7% +2.37 13–7 (65%) 2–2 (50%) 102.7 -6.10 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 1971 2188 160.4 — — — — +134 — — 70.8% +1.55 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 105.3 -3.37 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
35 1974 2195 126.8 — — — — +102 — — 100.0% +4.25 — 1–0 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1975 2177 133.3 — — — — +89 -156 — 84.2% +3.68 1–0 0–1 — +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1977 2125 120.2 — — — — — — +5 81.0% +2.19 0–1 — — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1978 2073 122.1 — — — — — — — 82.4% +2.82 1–0 1–1 — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1979 2046 117.3 — — — — — — — 77.8% +2.89 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1980 2016 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1981 1985 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1982 1954 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 1983 1924 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2199 159.7 — — — — +81 -81 +76 78.0% +2.45 33–24 (58%) 9–8 (53%) 99.5 -4.11 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.