H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ann Jones vs Penny Moor H2H: 3-0
Ann Jones holds a 3–0 lead over Penny Moor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Jones leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1970 Torquay fourth round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1970* | Torquay | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ann Jones | 6-0 6-0 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1970* | Newport Wales | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Ann Jones | 6-1 6-3 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1970* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ann Jones | 6-0 6-4 | Penny Moor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Jones | — | — | — | 2,178 | 254 | 64 | 79.9% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 28 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Jones | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1968 | 41–10 | 80.4% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1969 | 74–15 | 83.1% | — | 2,044 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1970 | 75–16 | 82.4% | — | 2,104 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1971 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 2,166 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1974 | 6–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,173 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1975 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 2,106 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1978 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 2,026 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 2,001 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,970 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,940 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,910 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |