H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 1-0

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi won the 1982 Sydney International round of 16 7-6 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
USA
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 7-6 4-6 6-4 Eva Pfaff Match data Nov 26, 1982* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi — — — 1,927 182 200 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Eva Pfaff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0
1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,459 0 0 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0
1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,457 0 0 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0
1972 5–4 55.6% — 1,516 0 0 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0
1973 28–30 48.3% — 1,648 0 0 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0
1974 24–13 64.9% — 1,789 0 0 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0
1975 7–12 36.8% — 1,749 0 0 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0
1976 9–16 36.0% — 1,725 0 0 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0
1977 4–8 33.3% — 1,741 0 0 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0
1978 10–7 58.8% — 1,812 0 1 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0
1979 26–22 54.2% — 1,876 0 1 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0
1980 13–20 39.4% — 1,720 0 1 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0
1981 23–19 54.8% — 1,853 0 2 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0
1982 18–20 47.4% — 1,829 0 2 — — — — — — —
1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,717 0 2 — — — — — — —
1984 2–5 28.6% — 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Eva Pfaff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0%
1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
1972 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6%
1973 4 5 9 44.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
1974 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
1975 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1976 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
1978 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
1979 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 15 13 28 53.6% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1980 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1981 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 47 48 95 49.5% 17 17 34 50.0% 62 57 119 52.1% 55 77 132 41.7% Career 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Eva Pfaff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1488 90.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.08 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33
1969 1473 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01
1970 1460 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20
1971 1457 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.19 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97
1972 1516 107.6 — — — — — — +85 47.6% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +1.17 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77
1973 1648 127.6 — — — — -75 -23 -24 50.0% -0.14 8–12 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 +4.10 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40
1974 1789 136.8 — — — — -106 -163 +40 59.5% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.2 +0.84 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72
1975 1750 124.3 — — — — -7 — +32 38.6% -1.16 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 -0.93 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11
1976 1725 128.2 — — — — -54 -76 +49 41.1% -0.80 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — -0.98 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01
1977 1742 135.5 — — — — -69 — +42 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -1.46 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01
1978 1812 140.6 — — — — -59 -137 -23 56.8% +0.62 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 -0.52 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64
1979 1877 150.6 — — — — +16 — -130 53.6% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 104.3 -0.27 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39
1980 1721 127.8 — — — — +27 — -41 46.7% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 2–4 (33%) 91.8 -0.82 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26
1981 1853 136.0 — — — — -25 -140 -63 53.7% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 -0.52 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
1982 1829 133.9 — — — — -40 — -1 43.0% -0.73 9–5 (64%) 6–1 (86%) 108.1 -4.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1718 131.1 — — — — +25 — +28 42.0% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 100.1 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1688 109.4 — — — — -21 — +87 26.7% -2.27 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1927 140.4 — — — — -21 -77 +2 48.0% -0.26 62–60 (51%) 33–26 (56%) 104.8 -1.46 Career 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.