H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-2

Kate Latham holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Kiyomura Hayashi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1982 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 6-7 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
USA
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-4 6-7 6-0 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Match data Jun 23, 1982* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Kate Latham 6-4 4-6 7-5 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Match data Jan 15, 1981* R32 Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 2-6 7-5 6-0 Kate Latham Match data Jan 17, 1980* R32 Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi — — — 1,925 182 200 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,459 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,457 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
1972 5–4 55.6% — 1,516 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
1973 28–30 48.3% — 1,648 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
1974 24–13 64.9% — 1,789 0 0 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
1975 7–12 36.8% — 1,749 0 0 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
1976 9–16 36.0% — 1,724 0 0 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
1977 4–8 33.3% — 1,740 0 0 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
1978 10–7 58.8% — 1,809 0 1 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
1979 26–22 54.2% — 1,874 0 1 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
1980 13–20 39.4% — 1,718 0 1 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
1981 23–19 54.8% — 1,852 0 2 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
1982 18–20 47.4% — 1,828 0 2 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,716 0 2 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6
1984 2–5 28.6% — 1,686 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
1972 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
1973 4 5 9 44.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
1974 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1976 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
1978 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
1979 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 15 13 28 53.6% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
1980 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
1981 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 47 48 95 49.5% 17 17 34 50.0% 62 57 119 52.1% 55 77 132 41.7% Career 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1488 90.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.08 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
1969 1473 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
1970 1460 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
1971 1457 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.19 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
1972 1516 107.6 — — — — — — +85 47.6% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +1.18 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
1973 1648 127.6 — — — — -75 -23 -24 50.0% -0.14 8–12 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 +4.25 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
1974 1789 136.8 — — — — -106 -163 +40 59.5% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.2 +0.93 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
1975 1750 124.3 — — — — -7 — +32 38.6% -1.16 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 -0.93 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
1976 1724 127.9 — — — — -53 -75 +49 41.1% -0.80 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — -0.96 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
1977 1740 135.0 — — — — -68 — +42 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -1.45 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
1978 1810 140.1 — — — — -59 -135 -22 56.8% +0.62 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 -0.22 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
1979 1875 150.3 — — — — +16 — -129 53.6% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 104.4 -0.58 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
1980 1719 127.4 — — — — +24 — -38 46.7% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 2–4 (33%) 91.8 -0.63 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
1981 1852 135.7 — — — — -26 -139 -64 53.7% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 -0.47 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
1982 1828 133.7 — — — — -41 — 0 43.0% -0.73 9–5 (64%) 6–1 (86%) 108.1 -4.10 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
1983 1717 130.9 — — — — +25 — +29 42.0% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 100.2 -1.71 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
1984 1687 109.3 — — — — -20 — +88 26.7% -2.27 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1926 140.1 — — — — -21 -76 +3 48.0% -0.26 62–60 (51%) 33–26 (56%) 104.8 -1.34 Career 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.